The warm-start bias of Yelp ratings
نویسنده
چکیده
Yelp ratings are often viewed as a reputation metric for local businesses. In this paper we study how Yelp ratings evolve over time. Our main finding is that on average the first ratings that businesses receive overestimate their eventual reputation. In particular, the first review that a business receives in our dataset averages 4.1 stars, while the 20th review averages just 3.69 stars. This significant warm-start bias which may be attributed to the limited exposure of a business in its first steps may mask analysis performed on ratings and reputational ramifications. Therefore, we study techniques to identify and correct for this bias. Further, we perform a case study to explore the effect of a Groupon deal on the merchant’s subsequent ratings and show both that previous research has overestimated Groupon’s effect to merchants’ reputation and that average ratings anticorrelate with the number of reviews received. Our analysis points to the importance of identifying and removing biases from Yelp reviews.
منابع مشابه
Analysis of Yelp Reviews
In the era of Big Data and Social Computing, the role of customer reviews and ratings can be instrumental in predicting the success and sustainability of businesses. In this paper, we show that, despite the apparent subjectivity of user ratings, there are also external, or objective factors which help to determine the outcome of a business’s reviews. The current model for social business review...
متن کاملCollective Factorization for Relational Data: An Evaluation on the Yelp Datasets
Matrix factorization has found incredible success and widespread application as a collaborative filtering based approach to recommendations. Unfortunately, incorporating additional sources of incomplete and noisy evidence is quite difficult to achieve in such models, however, is often crucial for obtaining further gains in accuracy. For example, in the Yelp datasets, additional information abou...
متن کاملThe relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA.
BACKGROUND Our goal was to compare hospital scores from the most widely used commercial website in the USA to hospital scores from more systematic measures of patient experience and outcomes, and to assess what drives variation in the commercial website scores. METHODS For a national sample of US hospitals, we compared scores on Yelp.com, which aggregates website visitor ratings (1-5 stars), ...
متن کاملSpatial analysis of users-generated ratings of yelp venues
Background: With popular location-based services on smart phones, users are willing to leave comments on the business venues (e.g., restaurants, shops, bars, etc.) that they visited. Reviews of users on Yelp venues somewhat indicate satisfaction of customers with services of those venues. Those reviews could be used to reflect service quality of business venues. Geo-localized venues could tell ...
متن کاملSelf – Others Rating Discrepancy of Task and Contextual Performance
This research compared ratings of task performance and contextual performance from three different sources: self, peer, and supervisor. Participants were service industry employees in the service industries in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A Sample of 146 employees and 40 supervisors from the service industries provided ratings of task performance and contextual performance. The results indicated th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
 
دوره abs/1202.5713 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012